Laceys Solicitors Laceys is a leading, forward-thinking law firm with specialist experts serving both individual and business clients across a broad spectrum of practice areas.

Navigation

News

Back

The Supreme Court unveils new rule on penalties.

31st October 2016 by Rob Kelly

Categories: What's New?
Tags:

The Supreme Court has handed down two important judgments in relation to penalty clauses which go some way to clarifying the law in this area and which will impact on how liquidated damages clauses in contracts are interpreted in the future (Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi; ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67).

The first case concerned a contract by which a businessman sold his controlling stake in a company.  The contract included restrictive covenants against competing activities and provided that, if he breached them, he would not receive the final two instalments of the purchase price.  He would also be required to sell his remaining shares to the purchaser at a price which excluded the value of the goodwill of the business.  The businessman successfully argued that the covenants were unenforceable penalty clauses.

The second case involved a motorist who was charged £85 after leaving his vehicle in a car park for more than the two hours permitted.  Numerous notices had warned drivers of the charges.  The motorist’s arguments that the charges were penal were unsuccessful.  His argument that the charges were unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 was also rejected.

In allowing the appeal in the first case, and dismissing the appeal in the second, the Supreme Court held that the clauses in both cases were enforceable.  In the first case, the goodwill of the company depended on the businessman’s loyalty and was crucial to the purchaser.  In the second case, the motorist was fully on notice that his contractual licence to park was subject to the two-hour time limit and that he would be charged if that was exceeded.

Although the Supreme Court acknowledged that the state of the law in relation to the rule against penal contract clauses was unsatisfactory, it refused to abolish the rule.  Clarifying the law, the court ruled that the true test for whether a clause is a penalty is to ask whether the impugned clause amounts to a secondary obligation which imposes a detriment on the contract breaker which is out of all proportion to any legitimate interest of the innocent party in the enforcement of the primary obligations under the contract.

Comment: The previous test of a ‘genuine pre-estimate of loss’ would seem to no longer be relevant.  Instead, what the courts will be concerned with is whether the clause in question imposes a detriment on the contract breaker “out of all proportion to any legitimate interest of the innocent party”.  In determining this, the courts will consider the wider commercial context of a transaction.

If you would like further information please contact Rob Kelly.

This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest.  The contents of this article do not constitute legal advice, is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered, and should not be relied on as such.  Legal advice should be sought about your specific circumstances before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed.

Rob Kelly

Senior Associate — Dispute Resolution

Direct dial: 01202 755217

Email

  • “A first choice for truly contentious Litigation in Automotive and Asset Finance and Leasing. His pure skill in tricky work wins through time and again and adds real value compared with the so called 'top tier' litigators. Truly capable, amenable and commercially minded business partners, the 'master chessmen' of their specialty.”

    Paul Maxted, previously the In house Legal Adviser and Company Secretary nearly 20 years, all Financial Services related companies in UK for Daimler, Mercedes-Benz

  • “I have had the pleasure of working with several members of the team at Laceys regularly over a period of years. I found Rob Kelly in particular, who worked on a successful litigation case for me over a period of several years to be outstanding in all aspects of the work he undertook, and the manner in which he did it. I now consider him a friend. I would not - and have not - hesitated to recommend Laceys to my family and friends, and continue to use them for all legal matters.”

    Dan Collins

  • “ I just wanted to thank you for your great work on the professional negligence case and other cases you have represented Indian Ocean and Tiien through the last few years.”

    Mehdi Vahdati, Director and Proprietor - Indian Ocean (Bournemouth) Limited

  • “I've worked with a fair few lawyers over the years and Rob Kelly is the most on the ball and efficient lawyers I've ever come across. I'm looking forward to working together for many years to come.”

    Roger Woodall, CEO - Diamond Sporting Group

Rob is an Associate Member of the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (September 2009).  Rob also holds an LLB (Hons) degree in law.  He successfully completed training as a mediator under the ADR Chambers / Harvard Law Project Scheme and was one of the first mediators to have been appointed an IMI Certified Mediation Advocate in the UK with a commercial practice.

Rob specialises in dispute resolution through litigation, arbitration and mediation, with particular emphasis on contractual disputes, claims involving allegations of professional negligence (which he has prosecuted on behalf of commercial and private clients and defended on behalf of insurers, re-insurers and Lloyd’s syndicates). He is regularly instructed in connection with substantial disputes involving contractual, professional negligence, contentious probate issues.  Rob also deals with contentious property and landlord and tenant issues.

Rob’s style is a mix of listening, asking (tough) questions, diplomacy and reality testing. He’s interested, flexible, and pragmatic. He offers a common sense, realistic approach to assist his clients in searching for solutions to their disputes and brings straight talking and integrity to his work.

Related articles

Aisling Scott, Laceys trainee solicitor, provides an insight into training from home

TRAINING FROM HOME. As the end of my second seat dawns, what strikes me is I have...

Read Article

Love Island’s Molly-Mae Hague breached ASA competition rules

Giveaways on social media are exceedingly common nowadays, and a great way for influencers and businesses to...

Read Article

Close X