Laceys Solicitors Laceys is a leading, forward-thinking law firm with specialist experts serving both individual and business clients across a broad spectrum of practice areas.

Navigation
If Social Services have notified you about legal proceedings concerning your child please call 01202 377995.

News

Back

Options for enforcing a judgment for payment

2nd August 2023 by Brendan Herbert

Categories: What's New?
Tags:

‘Obtaining a court judgment for payment from a debtor can be a huge relief, particularly if your claim was contested.  However, enforcing that judgment and actually obtaining payment can be problematic in itself if the debtor is not cooperative,’ says Brendan Herbert, head of the Dispute Resolution team at Laceys Solicitors.

There are, however, various methods you can use to enforce your judgment and get your money back. Choosing the right method can save you time, money and stress and ensure that you recoup sums that are rightfully owed to your business as quickly as possible.

Brendan provides a brief overview of the methods of enforcement that are available, and how your solicitor can help you decide upon and take the best enforcement action to obtain payment.

Writ of control and warrant of execution

This is a method of debt collection whereby a court enforcement officer (often known as a bailiff) will enforce your debt for you. In the County Court this is called a ‘writ of control’ and in the High Court this is called a ‘warrant of execution’.

It is necessary for your solicitor to apply to the court to issue a writ or warrant, but this does not require a court hearing. Once the bailiff is provided with the court order, they can attend the debtor’s premises and take goods to the value of the debt and your costs, and sell them in order to meet the target amount.

This can be a very effective method of obtaining funds. The downside is that there may not be goods of sufficient value to meet your debt, or goods may be owned by a third party, such as under a hire purchase or lease agreement. 

Charging order or order for sale

This is where a charge is granted by a court over a debtor’s beneficial interest in land or other assets. Once a charging order is registered, the debtor cannot sell that property without first paying its debts from the sale proceeds. This can be used in addition to other methods of enforcement and can be very effective. It has the benefit of placing your debt above other unsecured debts.

It is necessary to apply to the court to obtain an interim charging order first, then a final charging order.  If payment is still not forthcoming, then your solicitor can apply to court for an order for sale.

If the debtor is cash poor but asset rich this can be a very good way of enforcing your debt, especially if it is a significant sum.

The downside is that this process can be quite slow, as it is not possible to obtain an order for sale before going through the first two processes. You may also find that your charging order ranks behind others who take priority, so it is important that the asset being charged is of sufficient value to cover all possible charges before taking this action.

Third party debt order

A third party debt order can allow you to take funds owed to your debtor from a third party to pay your debt, without this money going to the debtor first. This can be a good tactic if you are owed money from a company with a transparent supply chain, where the debtor is owed money by a company up the chain. That money can be paid directly to you instead. It is also possible to intercept money that a bank was due to pay your debtor.

It is necessary for your solicitor to apply to court for an application for an interim third-party debt order before an application for a final third party debt order will be given. 

The benefit of these orders is that they can be quick, and it means a third party is obliged to make payment to you directly rather than to your debtor. However, the downside is that it is necessary to make two applications to the court before this can be effective. There also needs to be sufficient cash available to make this worthwhile.

Liquidation, administration, or receivership

If standard enforcement methods do not work then it may be necessary to move the debtor company into a formal insolvency process, such as liquidation, administration, or receivership.

  • Liquidation is a final solution for a company. You can issue a winding up petition against the debtor company in court and, if granted, the company must cease to trade immediately and an Official Receiver will be appointed over the company. They will gather in all of the company’s assets, and pay the company’s creditors from those assets in a specific priority order set out in insolvency legislation.

While this is sometimes the only way to obtain payment from a non-cooperating debtor, unless you have a secured interest such as a fixed or floating charge, or a personal guarantee, you will rank equally with all unsecured creditors and are therefore unlikely to be paid in full.

  • Administration is an alternative method that can be used by a creditor of a company. It differs from liquidation in that it is intended to be a rescue process, or at least a process that will bring a better return for creditors than liquidation, because often a company will continue to trade in administration, even if just for a short while. Therefore, a business or asset sale may obtain a higher return than a liquidation sale of assets. Whether this is the best option for you will depend on the type of business of the debtor.

The administrator will run the company and will pay creditors as they are able to in due course, under the same legislative priority order as liquidation.

With both procedures it can take some time to recover your money, and even if you do, depending on the financial position of the company, and your own secured status, you are unlikely to recover it all.  It is, however, a good way of focusing a company to pay their debt and ensuring they take your payment request seriously.

  • Receivership may be an option if you are a secured creditor with a charge over a company – either fixed or floating – it is possible to appoint a ‘receiver’ who will be appointed over the secured assets under the charge only, and will sell these or obtain rent on these in order to repay your debt, depending on the asset that is secured by the charge.

This method will often be used once a charging order has been granted over a company and/or its assets, and can be very effective in obtaining a return on money owed.

How we can help

If you have an uncooperative and difficult debtor, sometimes obtaining a judgment debt is just the beginning of your journey to recover your debt. We will review the financial position of the debtor with you to decide upon the best and fastest way of enforcing that judgment debt for you.

For further information, please contact  please contact Brendan Herbert on 01202 377810 or via email at b.herbert@laceyssolicitors.co.uk

This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. Please note that the law may have changed since this article was published.

Brendan Herbert

Partner — Dispute Resolution

Direct dial: 01202 377810

Email

Brendan Herbert
  • “Brendan has been really great on a whole range of professional negligence issues. I highly recommend him.”

    Cressida Granger, Perspex Pension Fund/Mathmos Ltd

  • “Brendan is an excellent support and shows empathy when dealing with difficult situations. He explains clearly costs and possible outcomes and makes me feel like I have somebody on my team.”

    Jacqueline Entwistle

  • “Always professional and prompt on a wide range of legal matters.”

    Matthew Hornsby

Brendan has a BSc in Zoology and Psychology from the University of Liverpool, and went on to obtain his Post Graduate Diploma in Law, and Legal Practice Course at the College of Law (now the University of Law), in Chester.  Brendan completed his training with a national firm in Manchester and London, and was admitted as a solicitor in 2005.

Brendan is part of our Dispute Resolution Team, working with both private individuals and businesses to either avoid or resolve disputes. With over 10 years experience he has helped clients deal with a wide variety of issues from professional negligence claims and breach of contract disputes, to more specialist areas including construction disputes, intellectual property work, licensing applications and inheritance claims.

Brendan has a very approachable manner, and places great importance on client relationships. He enjoys tackling all matters directly, and always looks to provide clients with practical, cost-effective solutions. Outside of work Brendan runs a hugely successful music festival in the Cotswolds.

When he is not knee-deep in mud at a festival, he enjoys travelling (especially in Africa, where he worked as a safari camp manager for a year),  golf, photography and getting out and about in the Dorset countryside.

To find out more about Brendan being described in the 2021 Legal 500 as a ‘Next Generation Partner’ and what this means to him here;

Related articles

profit and loss

Calculating ‘loss of profit’ in a business dispute

If you are involved in a business dispute which has reached the point of discussing loss of...

Read Article

How to deal with a dispute arising from an indemnity

As a business owner you may well have been given the benefit of an indemnity in any...

Read Article

Close X